Sunday, 30 June 2019

UK firms hit the brakes as Brexit and bad weather weigh - CBI

Political  reporter(wp/reuters):::
Britain’s private sector has had its worst three months in nearly seven years as the Brexit impasse and poor weather hit economic growth, the Confederation of British Industry said on Sunday.
After a surge earlier this year, caused by companies stockpiling ahead of the original March 29 Brexit deadline, private sector activity in the three months to June contracted at the quickest pace since September 2012.
The balance of firms reporting growth sank to -13%, according to the CBI’s monthly Growth Indicator.
Rain Newton-Smith, the CBI’s chief economist, blamed the weakness on the after-effects of the stockpiling rush, Brexit-related shutdowns in Britain’s car industry and bad weather.
“But underlying activity and confidence is clearly subdued,” she said. “The UK economy is being stifled by uncertainty about the UK’s relationship with the EU. The need for the new prime minister to secure a deal with the EU is urgent.”
Britain’s Conservative Party is due to announce its new leader, who will become the next prime minister, on July 23. Both contenders - former foreign minister Boris Johnson and the current incumbent Jeremy Hunt - have said they are prepared to lead Britain out of the EU without a deal if necessary.
The Bank of England has said it expects zero growth in the economy in the second quarter, reflecting the unwinding of the stockpiling boost in the first three months of the year, uncertainty about the Brexit outcome and slower global growth.

Her Majesty The Queen's Scottish Parliament Speech

Presiding Officer, First Minister, Members of the Scottish Parliament, The Duke of Rothesay and I are pleased to join you today in marking the Twentieth Anniversary of the Scottish Parliament.
We fondly remember that proud day, when new Members gathered in the Assembly Hall to celebrate Scotland’s first parliament in 300 years. 
I have noted on previous occasions my great affection for Scotland, and the many happy and personal connections I enjoy with this wonderful country.  It has been with great pleasure that over the years I have watched Scotland grow and prosper, and have been with you at each stage of your parliamentary life, including on landmark occasions such as today. 
Twenty years on, this chamber continues to be at the centre of Scottish life, as an important forum to engage and unite diverse communities and also a home for passionate debate and discussion.  Through new initiatives you continue to strive to be responsive and accountable to the people you serve, and to engage and involve those who might not otherwise participate in political debate.
It is perhaps worth reflecting that at the heart of the word “Parliament” lies its original meaning: a place to talk. I have no doubt that for most of these last twenty years this striking chamber has provided exactly that, a place to talk. But of course it must also be a place to listen --- a place to hear views that inevitably may differ quite considerably, one from another --- and a place to honour those views. In turn, this occasion today gives us all an opportunity to honour those who help turn talk into action, not just Members of the Scottish Parliament but all those behind the scenes -- the many unseen, unsung individuals who are not afforded recognition by the nature of their role in Parliament, but who nonetheless join together to support parliamentary work in the service of others, and the success of the nation as a whole.
Presiding Officer, as we look to the future, it is my sincere hope that this Parliament, and all those who come to serve in it, will use the power of this chamber to celebrate those invisible pillars of our communities, and follow their example by working tirelessly to improve people’s lives, and strengthen the bonds of friendship and partnership both at home and abroad. 
Today, with the echo of excitement and enthusiasm I encountered twenty years ago, I extend to you all my warmest good wishes on this special anniversary, for the continuing prosperity of the people of Scotland, and for those who represent them in this remarkable Parliament.

ROYAL PRESS-ENGLAND

Thursday, 27 June 2019

Any attempt to stop government funding would be irresponsible - PM May's spokeswoman

Political reporter(wp/reuters):::
Any attempt to cut off funding to British government departments would be “grossly irresponsible”, a spokeswoman for Prime Minister Theresa May said on Thursday, after reports that lawmakers would try to do so to stop a no-deal Brexit.
Earlier, pro-EU Conservative lawmaker Dominic Grieve and Labour’s Margaret Beckett tabled an amendment, or change, to routine financial legislation, called estimates, to stop funding if Britain leaves the European Union without a deal.
“Any attempt to deny vital funding to Whitehall departments would be grossly irresponsible and ... this is government spending for this financial year and funds crucial areas like schools, housing and welfare,” the spokeswoman said.
She added that it was not clear whether the amendment would be selected by parliament to be debated.

Security threat forces plane to land at Stansted

Air India plane
Pic-Air India flies to 37 international destinations(wp/bbc)
Airport reporter,London(wp/bbc:::
An Air India passenger plane has made a "precautionary landing" at London's Stansted Airport after the airline initially reported a bomb threat.
Flight AI191 was flying from the Indian city of Mumbai to Newark in the US.
The Ministry of Defence said RAF Typhoon fighter jets escorted the aircraft as it made its landing.
Air India tweeted there had been a bomb threat, then deleted the tweet. An airline official later told Reuters news agency the threat was a hoax.
A statement from Stansted Airport said the plane landed at about 10:15 BST and was now in an isolated part of the airport - and the main terminal is unaffected.
It was not known how many passengers were on board, the airport said.An RAF spokesman said the Typhoon jets were launched from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to escort the Air India plane to the airport in Essex.
He said they were authorised to fly at supersonic speed and across nearby Derbyshire, a sonic boom was heard.
Multiple calls were made to the police and fire service from people who feared there had been an explosion.
The emergency services could not explain the cause of the loud bang heard shortly before 10:00 BST until the RAF confirmed it was their Typhoons and apologised for the inconvenience.

British prime minister would Boris Johnson what kind of make on the world stage?

Special political report(wp/reuters:::
When Johnson was given the foreign job in 2016, after Britain voted to leave the EU, he was viewed as an unlikely choice by politicians and public alike given his tendency to court controversy with gaffes, oddball jokes and off-the-cuff remarks.
The early days seemed to confirm the worst fears of those who saw the Conservative lawmaker as an unsuitable diplomat, at a critical time when Britain needed to forge new political and commercial ties with a slew of countries.
What should have been a routine conference in Italy, the “Mediterranean Dialogues Forum” aimed at building relations with leading envoys from the West and Middle East, instead turned into something of a diplomatic incident.
Johnson made headlines by going off-script and accusing Saudi Arabia, an important regional ally, of acting as a puppeteer in proxy wars under the guise of religion.
The backlash was swift from Prime Minister Theresa May, who said his comments did not reflect “actual policy”, dishing out what a government source described as a shocking and very public “cuffing” for a senior minister.
Now May is stepping down over her failure to extract Britain from the European Union. Johnson, a leader of the Brexit campaign, is the overwhelming favourite to become leader of the governing Conservative Party next month, which would also make him prime minister.
The 55-year-old, famous for his messy mop of blond hair and dishevelled style, has turned upper-class English eccentricity into a political asset in Britain and perfected a personal brand based on a comic talent and a seemingly shambolic style.
His critics say this robs him of statesman-like gravity, arguing that it’s difficult to take seriously a man who once said the chance of him becoming prime minister was about as likely as finding Elvis on Mars.
However two of Johnson’s aides and another veteran Conservative who knows him said that he was often misunderstood and that beneath his blustering, self-confident demeanour was a shy, serious man focussed on his goals.
He is a natural introvert, two sources close his team told Reuters, adding that his shyness is often construed as arrogance, and he needs a lot of time alone before speaking in public - distinctively at odds with the public perception of Johnson being a natural, unscripted showman.
“Before speaking to a room, he needs to corral himself,” said the veteran Conservative. “It’s not a performance but it saps him of energy. He just needs to summon up the energy.”
One aide, a government source and an EU diplomat also pointed to an influential, but behind-the-scenes, role he played as foreign secretary following the poisoning of a former Russian spy, Sergei Skripal, by a nerve agent last year in England.
One government source said Johnson had put his “shoulder to the wheel” to win international support for sanctions and Russian diplomatic expulsions from a long list of countries.
A senior European diplomat agreed that he was “professional” in this role, which attracted little publicity.
“People in Brussels didn’t take Boris seriously back then,” the diplomat said. “In March last year, he showed he could drop the clownish personality, he showed a will to discuss the Skripal affair in the most serious terms and to make the point to his counterparts that they needed to back Britain on this.”

IRREVERENT INSURGENT

Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, to give his full name, is something of an enigma at home and abroad.
He is man of apparent contradictions, with his privileged background and bursts of Latin phrases seemingly at odds with his popular appeal when elected mayor of left-leaning London in 2008 with the biggest personal mandate in British history.
He is one of those rare politicians to be most commonly referred to by most members of the public by their first names.
Like U.S. President Donald Trump, he can emerge unscathed from gaffes and scandals that would sink any normal public figure. Other offensive remarks he has made include calling black people “piccaninnies” and saying Muslim women wearing burkas “look like letter boxes”.
“Boris is a flawed character and flaky but most politicians are underneath,” said Ed Costelloe, chair of the campaign group Conservative Grassroots. “It would be lovely to have Mother Theresa as prime minister, but it ain’t going to happen.”
In fact, some people love him all the more because he appears to be an irreverent insurgent who defies the media training of polished politics, shooting from the hip with comic timing and flair. Others seem to give him more leeway.
After his incendiary comments on Saudi Arabia, for example, two British officials said his words had not in fact gone down badly in Riyadh. “The Saudis appreciated his buffoonery, they understand his kind of humour,” said one of the officials.
The biggest task ahead, should he become leader, would be withdrawal talks with the EU, which has said it will not reopen the Withdrawal Agreement agreed by May in November - a deal that was repeatedly rejected by British lawmakers and led to the original Brexit date of March 29 being pushed back.
Johnson has offended many in Europe, with remarks such as suggesting Italy should help with a Brexit deal to avoid losing out on sales of Prosecco sparkling wine and declaring it was “bollocks” to say that freedom of movement was a founding principle of the EU.Yet the British government sources said his ability to wrestle changes to the deal from Brussels, as he has demanded, would come down to whether he can carry the support of British lawmakers and end a stalemate that has incensed EU officials.
“His success depends on whether the EU believes he can actually command a majority,” said one of the sources. “The thing about the PM was that they just didn’t believe she could ever get it through so were never going to give any more ground. If they think Boris can get it through, they might shift.”

IT’S ALL ABOUT BREXIT

Johnson has cast himself as the only leadership candidate who can deliver Brexit on the next deadline of Oct. 31 - with or without a deal.
The sources close his team said he was approaching his bid in a similarly quiet way to the Skripal manoeuvring. He has built support through behind-the-scenes talks with lawmakers rather through media appearances and speeches - and had been conspicuously absent from public sight until this week.
He has been listening closely to the counsel of his closest aides and veteran election strategist Lynton Crosby, who is not officially on the payroll but is offering advice.
Johnson’s strategy of steering clear of the airwaves and avoiding public head-to-head debates has been carefully thought through as part of a leadership campaign in the works for months in anticipation of May’s announcement five weeks ago that she would step down, said the sources.
The plan appeared uncharacteristic for a man who made his name by being highly visible, including appearing in comedy shows and one of Britain’s best-loved TV soap operas.
He even drew accusations from his only remaining leadership rival, Jeremy Hunt, of being a coward for avoiding head-to-head debates. Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd said she found Johnson’s decision to ignore live TV debates “very odd”.
The strategy was partly borne of the fact that Johnson is widely viewed as a near-certainty to win the party leadership, and become prime minister, barring an unforeseen catastrophe.
Foreign Secretary Hunt voted to stay in the European Union in 2016, which is likely to count against him among the around 160,000 party members who will choose the winner and are mainly pro-Brexit.
However Johnson was forced to veer from the gameplan and break cover this week when he was faced with exactly the kind of negative publicity his team had hoped to avoid, after a neighbour called the police upon hearing Johnson and his girlfriend shouting and smashing plates.
Police found no cause for action, but the story dominated the front pages of Britain’s newspapers, with some questioning Johnson’s character and past - he is divorcing his second wife and has had several reported affairs.
Following the furore, he changed gear and launched into a media blitz on TV and radio.
Nonetheless, few in his party believe anything can seriously impede his cruise to 10 Downing Street.
“Boris is still well ahead with the membership who will ultimately decide who the next prime minister is,” said Conservative lawmaker and Johnson supporter Andrew Bridgen.
“The overriding issue is Brexit and unfortunately Jeremy voted remain.”

Sunday, 23 June 2019

PM hopeful Hunt says would go for no-deal Brexit if EU doesn't shift

Political reporter(wp/reuters):::
Jeremy Hunt, the underdog in the race to be next British prime minister, said he would take the United Kingdom out of the European Union without a deal on Oct. 31 if the EU had not showed it was willing to renegotiate the Brexit deal.
“If we got to the 31st of October, and the EU have not shown the willingess to negotiate a better deal ... then my judgment is that weighing those difficult options up, the political risk of no Brexit is far worse than the economic risk of no deal,” Hunt said at a leadership hustings event in Birmingham, central England.
“I would take us out of the European Union in that situation.”

Feltham shooting: Man dies at block of flats

Crime reporter(wp/bbc):::
A man aged in his 20s has been shot dead at a block of flats in south-west London.
The victim was discovered seriously injured when armed police were called to Exeter House, Watermill Way, Feltham, at 23:05 BST on Friday.
He was treated by paramedics but died at the scene shortly after. His next of kin have been told.
Scotland Yard said nobody else was injured in the shooting and no arrests have been made.
A post-mortem examination will take place "in due course", the force said.
In a separate attack, a 17-year-old boy was left in a critical condition after being stabbed on a north London street.
The teenager was taken to an east London hospital following the attack on Goswell Road at 23:10.
No arrests have been made. Police said the victim's family have been informed.

Manchester Airport: IT failure causes check-in delays

Special report(wp/bbc):::
Passengers have been facing delays at Manchester Airport after an IT failure prevented many from checking-in at all three terminals.
Some travellers said they had been waiting to check-in for more than three hours, with long queues building up.
An airport spokesman said the IT issue had been resolved in the afternoon, adding: "We apologise to our passengers for the inconvenience."
The issue first arose at 11:30 BST on Saturday.

Backlog of passengers

The airport said there were no longer any queues at check-in but there were knock-on delays to some flights.
Some airlines tried to check people in manually during the IT failure and have been working through a backlog of passengers after the issue was resolved.
Jordan Elliott was one of many to complain to the airport on social media.
He tweeted a picture of the queues and said: "@manairport in total lockdown. No-one checking in due to computer failure!"

'Utter carnage'

Michael Ripley was on his way to Fuerteventura with his family for his wedding anniversary when they got caught up in the delays.
"It's utter carnage... All the IT systems were down at check in. No-one could help us," he said.

"A process to check-in that would normally take five or 10 minutes took two hours."Aimée de Hamel, 19, from East Yorkshire, was waiting on a stationary plane where as many as 40 passengers had not yet been able to board due to the system failure.
She said many people had to find out what was happening by looking on Twitter and described the experience as "atrocious".
"Everyone was so angry, confused and tired of waiting around with no answers," she added.

Wednesday, 19 June 2019

Tory leadership race: Rivals in BBC debate clash over Brexit deadline

Political reporter(wp/bbc):::
Tory leadership rivals have clashed in a live BBC TV debate on whether the UK can leave the EU, no matter what, by the 31 October deadline.
Asked for a guarantee he would do this, Boris Johnson described the deadline as "eminently feasible".
Sajid Javid said it "focused minds", but Michael Gove and Jeremy Hunt said extra time might be needed.
Rory Stewart accused his colleagues of lacking realism - of "staring at the wall and saying 'believe in Britain'".
The five men vying to be Conservative Party leader - and the UK's next prime minister - were taking part in a live televised debate on BBC One.
Former Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab was earlier eliminated in the second round of voting, when Conservative MPs held a secret ballot.
On Wednesday, the third round of voting will take place between 15:00 and 17:00 BST. The result is expected at 18:00 and the MP with the lowest number of votes will be out of the race.
During Tuesday's hour-long debate, all five men ruled out calling a general election until Brexit was resolved.
But the encounter exposed divisions in their approaches to Brexit and whether they could accept the UK leaving the EU without an agreement.
The candidates, who faced questions from members of the public on issues ranging from climate change to Islamophobia, also disagreed over whether to prioritise tax cuts or increased spending on public services after the UK leaves the EU.
Mr Johnson, the frontrunner in the contest, was taking part in his first debate of the campaign after he skipped Sunday's Channel 4 encounter.

How candidates' Brexit plans stacked up

The former foreign secretary said the British people were "fed up" with the current deadlock over Brexit and the Tories would pay a "really serious price" if this continued.
He warned of a "catastrophic loss of confidence in politics" if the latest Brexit deadline was not met. Asked if he could guarantee this, he replied that "October 31 is eminently feasible".
"If we allow 31 October to come and go as we let March come and go, I think the public would look on us with increasing mystification," Mr Johnson said.
He also suggested there was no issue with continuing free trade after Brexit - citing something called Article 24 of GATT - but as BBC Reality Check points out, that relies on the UK and EU both signing up and in the event of no deal, that will not happen.
Mr Javid, who came fifth in Tuesday's second round of voting, said a deadline was needed to "focus minds" in both the EU and the UK.
"We have to learn from our mistakes," he said. "One of the mistakes we have made is having a flexible deadline."
He suggested the route to getting a Brexit deal through Parliament was by re-presenting Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement but without the controversial Irish backstop.
Mr Gove said an "arbitrary" deadline was counter-productive and if he was prime minister he would be prepared to delay Brexit by a matter of days to finalise a deal.
"You sometimes have extra time in football matches in order to slot home the winner."
Mr Hunt said he would back a no-deal exit as a "last resort" but if the UK was close to finalising a deal with the EU he would extend the talks to prevent the disruption a no-deal exit would cause to business.
Both Mr Hunt and Mr Javid suggested new technology could potentially solve the intractable Irish border issue, but the EU has said there is currently none in use anywhere in the world that can keep it as open after Brexit as it is now link
Mr Stewart said he would not allow a "damaging and unnecessary" no-deal exit and his rivals could not explain how they could possibly do this "against the consent of Parliament".
He suggested he was seeking the most realistic "door" out of the EU while "everyone else was staring at the wall and saying believe in Britain".

What Europe made of the debate

EU politicians across the continent were dipping in and out of the debate. The comments I've heard so far off-the-record have not been particularly complimentary.
The EU simply thinks that most of those leadership candidates are not being realistic.
EU leaders are preparing a united, determined front when it comes to the idea of renegotiating the Brexit deal, and the answer is no.
Even if, come the autumn, the EU were to be tempted to reopen some of those questions such as the Irish backstop, those conversations could never be finished by 31 October - the date by which most of those leadership candidates want to leave the EU.
That's why this evening the EU thinks the idea of a no-deal Brexit is becoming increasingly likely.
Presentational grey line

Tax plans also a dividing line

Moving beyond Brexit, the candidates clashed over their economic plans and whether to prioritise higher spending on public services or tax cuts.
There were sharp exchanges between Mr Stewart and other contenders, Michael Gove accusing him of having "no plan" for how to run the economy or public services.
"Bringing people together is not enough," he told Mr Stewart, who has emerged as the surprise contender in the race.
However, after the debate Mr Stewart admitted his performance had been lacklustre, adding he did not think the "strange" format worked for him.
Mr Gove also took aim at Mr Johnson's plans to give a tax cut to those earning more than £50,000 a year, saying the focus should be on "helping the poorest in society".
Helping middle-earners was "sensible", Mr Johnson responded.
Mr Stewart said promising tax cuts was "wrong" given the uncertainty around Brexit.
He called for a "revolution" in care for the elderly, calling current provision a "disgrace".
Mr Hunt, who was health secretary for six years, also called for increased investment, suggesting cuts to care budgets under the current government had gone "too far".
Mr Johnson reiterated that it was his "ambition" to cut taxes for higher earners, but as Chris Mason pointed out, that seemed less committal than a "promise" to do it.
Meanwhile, speaking to Newsnight after the debate, Mr Gove said he believed he had won the debate because of what he said were his "detailed answers" and "clear plan" on Brexit.
Of his rivals, he said there were "some other great people" but added: "They will all be fantastic members of my team."

Challenge over Islamophobia

Amid claims that the Conservatives have failed to tackle Islamophobia in the party, the candidates were pressed by an imam to accept that "words have consequences".
Mr Johnson said he apologised if anything he had written, during 20 to 30 years as a journalist, or had said during his political career had caused offence.
But he defended his conduct as foreign secretary in relation to the case of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who remains in jail in Iran on spying charges.
He suggested his claim in 2017 that the dual British-Iranian national was actually working as a journalist in the country - which the Iranian authorities cited as a reason to increase her sentence - "did not make any difference".
"If you point the finger at the UK, all you are doing is exculpating those who are truly responsible," he said.
Mr Javid challenged the other candidates to agree to an external inquiry into Islamophobia in the Tory Party - which they all appeared to do.
Referring to Donald Trump's string of attacks on London's Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan, he said politicians should be "brave enough" to call out Islamophobia wherever it came from.

Woman, 83, in hospital after William and Kate convoy crash

Britain"s Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge and Prince William, Duke of Cambridge at Ascot
Pic:::The royal couple have sent their best wishes to the woman, called Irene/wp/bbc
Royal correspondent(wp/bbc):::
An elderly woman is in a serious condition in hospital after a road accident involving the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's police escort.
Prince William and Kate were travelling from London to Windsor when the woman, 83, was hurt on Monday.
The accident involved a marked police motorbike in the convoy, and the police watchdog is now investigating.
Kensington Palace said the royal couple are "deeply concerned and saddened" and have been in touch with the woman.
The woman - who is called Irene, according to the palace - was taken to hospital in a critical condition following the collision on Upper Richmond Road in Richmond, south-west London at around 12:50 BST on 17 June.
She is now in a serious but stable condition in hospital.
A Kensington Palace spokesperson said: "Their Royal Highnesses have sent their very best wishes to Irene and her family and will stay in touch throughout every stage of her recovery."
The duke and duchess are understood to have sent flowers to the woman.

Investigation launched

Watchdog the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said it is investigating the circumstances of the collision after it was referred to them by the Metropolitan Police as is "in line with procedure".
An IOPC spokesman said: "Our staff attended the scene of the incident and after careful consideration, we have launched an independent investigation.
"The investigation is in its very early stages and the officer involved is assisting our enquiries as a witness.
"Our immediate thoughts are with the injured woman and her family and those affected by the incident."
Prince William and Kate were on their way to Windsor for the St George's Chapel service commemorating the Order of the Garter.
In January, the Duke of Edinburgh, 98, was involved in a car crash while driving near the Queen's Sandringham estate.
Prince Philip flipped his Land Rover Freelander after colliding with a Kia car as he pulled out on to the A149 in Norfolk.