Monday, 22 October 2018

Pound Sterling falls to 2-1/2 week low on fear of challenge to PM May

Business correspondent(reuters/wp):
Pound Sterling fell on Monday as fears grew that the Irish border issue and disagreements within Britain’s ruling Conservatives over Brexit could see Prime Minister Theresa May face a serious leadership challenge.
The pound lost ground against the dollar and the euro, at one point falling close to 1 percent to the greenback, though it later clawed back some of the losses.
Sunday newspapers quoting unnamed lawmakers as saying May should prepare for a challenge to her leadership.
A report by the Telegraph newspaper’s deputy political editor said the DUP, the Northern Irish party which props up May’s government, would back an amendment proposed by rebel Brexiteer lawmakers that would effectively make the European Union’s proposal on the Irish border illegal
However, a rebel lawmaker, Steve Baker who had tabled the amendments, was later reported as planning to withdraw the proposal, according to The Times newspaper
Lee Hardman, FX strategist at MUFG in London said he still expected a deal eventually to be struck over Brexit but added: “The path to a deal seems to have become a bit harder.”
“On the weekend, we saw increasing concern over political instability in the UK and the threat of another leadership challenge back on the table,” Hardman said.
By 1530 GMT, sterling was down 0.65 percent, having earlier hit a low of $1.2957, its weakest since Oct. 4. GBP=D3
Against the euro, the pound was down 0.3 percent EURGBP=D3, well off earlier lows of 88.57 pence which had been a 2 1/2-week low. Technicals indicated sterling had fallen below its 55-day moving average — closing below this level would signal more downside risks, chartists said.
Jittery markets closely watched May’s speech to parliament, at which she is expected to say that 95 percent of the Brexit divorce deal has been settled. But she will maintain opposition to the European Union’s proposal for the land border with Northern Ireland.
However, her proposal to extend a status-quo transition period beyond the current proposed date of December 2021 has angered the eurosceptics in her party.
“(The leadership challenge issue) is hanging over sterling, which is (also) waiting for another steer on Brexit, likely from this address from May today,” Investec economist Victoria Clarke said.
Late last week, Brexit optimism, along with a paring of dollar long positions, saw short sterling bets fall to a net 50,353 contracts, versus more than 60,000 the week before, calculations by Reuters and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission showed.
But analysts at Nomura said they were taking profit on long sterling positions, noting short-term risks.
“Despite our view that a leadership confidence vote on May is no more than hyped-up tail risk, we admit the Conservative Party has never looked closer to triggering such action as it does today,” Nomura said, noting that centrist Tories as well as Brexiteers were disgruntled with the direction of Brexit policy.

Fertility doctor offers women a bargain deal to freeze eggs

Controversial:  Dr Mohammed Taranissi says he wants to help ease the pressure on women surrounding age and fertility
Pic:Dr Mohammed Taranissi says he wants to help ease the pressure on women surrounding age and fertility ( PA )
Health reporter(wp/es):
One of Britain’s most controversial fertility doctors is to cut the price of egg freezing by more than two thirds in a bid to convince more women in their thirties to undergo the procedure.
Mohammed Taranissi is offering to “bank” the eggs of women aged 38 and under for £750 plus £1-a-day storage, down from the typical £3,500 cost of one-off egg freezing.
The bargain  deal is being offered at his ARGC clinic in Harley Street and the New Life Clinic in Epsom, Surrey, and comes after a report showed a huge rise in egg freezing. 
Dr Taranissi told the Standard: “We were the first to carry out this  procedure and I want to be the first to make it affordable for more women. There is so much pressure on women and many are now delaying having a family...  let’s try and preserve their fertility and ease that pressure. I am not saying egg freezing is a magic solution but at least it gives women options.” However, the deal does not include the cost of drugs and blood tests, up to £2,000.
Freezing allows women to keep their own eggs until they are ready to use them, but pregnancy success rates are still only 18 per cent.

'I'm freezing eggs for children at 40'

A financial consultant preparing to freeze her eggs in the next few weeks believes more women should be given the option. 
Judith Sarpong, below, who is in her midthirties, wants children before she is 40 and will consider using a sperm donor if she hasn’t met anyone by then. 
She told the Standard: “I don’t want to be with somebody just because my clock is ticking. I want to be able to take my time to find the right person and freezing my eggs
gives me a feeling of security. But if I get to 40 or 45 and I haven’t met the right person I also want the option to use a sperm donor so that I don’t miss out on the chance to have children.”
Ms Sarpong, from West Sussex, is aware of the low success rates but wants to take the chance. She said: “You assume you will be married with kids by 30 but these days it just
doesn’t happen that way. I know that many of my eggs may not survive the defrosting but if I can just get one or two that will give me a chance to have a child.”
Ms Sarpong saved money on the cost of egg freezing by undergoing blood tests at her doctor and ordering her fertility drugs from Asda and Tesco.
The first report into egg freezing by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority found the number of women freezing their eggs has doubled since 2013 and risen 460 per cent since 2010.
Women take powerful drugs to stimulate the ovaries to produce as many eggs as possible then have a “retrieval” operation under local anaesthetic. The eggs are then stored for future use as part of IVFtreatment. Recorded success rates are still low but doctors claim this is partly because most women freezing their eggs currently are in their late thirties and early forties. The HFEA says eggs frozen before women are 35 — and ideally younger — have a better  chance. 
Dr Amin Gafa of the New Life Clinic, owned by Dr Taranissi, said: “The truth is many women don’t think about a baby until after 35, so we are just reflecting reality. We live in a very competitive world and having a child can affect your career and chances of progressing.”
Dr Taranissi, who was said to earn £25 million a year in 2012, will face claims he is encouraging women to postpone motherhood and creating false hope for older women. But he said he was losing money on the deal.
He has faced controversy in the past. Dr Taranissi was paid almost £1 million by the BBC after a legal battle over allegations about his techniques on Panorama in 2007. He also had disputes with the HFEA and a raid in 2007 on one of his clinics was found to be illegal.
Fertility expert Dr Zeynep Gurtin from UCL said any significant reduction to freezing costs is welcome but “I would still urge women to think carefully about the pros and cons.” Under fertility laws women freezing eggs for “social reasons” must use them within 10 years.

Michael Stirling admits murder of midwife after 'affair' and dumping her body

The body of midwife Samatha Eastwood was discovered in a rural area near Caverswall, Staffordshire, earlier this year
Pic-1:The body of midwife Samatha Eastwood was discovered in a rural area near Caverswall, Staffordshire, earlier this year ( PA/wp )



Pic-2:Michael Stirling pleaded guilty at Northampton Crown Court to murdering midwife Samantha Eastwood (Staffordshire Police/PA)

Crime reporter(wp/es):
A man has admitted murdering midwife Samantha Eastwood in a bout of "intense rage" after having a "long-standing affair" with her.
Michael Stirling, the brother-in-law of Ms Eastwood's ex John Peake, pleaded guilty to murder at Northampton Crown Court on Monday.
The court heard he strangled 28-year-old Ms Eastwood during a confrontation at her home in Staffordshire, before burying her in a shallow grave.
His barrister, Charles Miskin, told the court: "This was not a pre-meditated act. The context of the killing was a background of growing tension arising from a longstanding, but not particularly intense affair."
Ms Eastwood had last been seen leaving Royal Stoke University Hospital on July 27 after a night shift.
Mr Miskin said that on the afternoon of the killing, "various things were said" between the two "which led to him becoming very angry".
He added: "There was an argument in that context and that led to him being very angry.
"After a struggle and while she was on the floor, he put his hands over her throat, her mouth and nose, and as a result of that she died."
Mr Miskin said: "During his intense rage, he originally intended to cause her really serious bodily harm, but matters escalated and he carried out the intention to kill her."
"He panicked afterwards and buried her in an area of which he had some knowledge.
"He entirely accepts that he tried, wholly dishonestly, to mislead others in the afternoon after the killing.
"He is absolutely horrified about what happened and is deeply sorry, not for himself, but for all the others who are victims of this crime."
Stirling, who had no previous convictions, appeared via video link in court on Monday.
He was sporting a full beard, sat at a table and wearing a dark grey t-shirt. Ms Eastwood's mother, sister, and Mr Peake watched from the public gallery.


Stirling, 32, of Stoke-on-Trent, will be sentenced at Stafford Crown Court on December 3.
Ms Eastwood's body was discovered in a rural area near Caverswall, Staffordshire, wrapped in a duvet and with tape around her eyes and face.
She had been missing for eight days.

extending Brexit transition beyond 2020 would be a last resort with deal '95 per cent' complete

Theresa May said the Government must hold its nerve
Pic: Theresa May said the Government must hold its nerve (wp )
Political reporter(wp/es):
Theresa May has said the Government must hold its nerve as Brexit negotiations entered their final stages.
The Prime Minister addressed the Commons to say that the Tories must "not give in to those who want to stop Brexit with a politicians' vote."
She added that she "did not want nor expect to extend the Brexit transition period past the end of 2020."
Mrs May added that there may be circumstances in which a short extension to the transition period after Britain leaves the EU is a preferable option.
However, in a statement to the Commons, she said the transition period would have to be completed well before the end of the parliament in June 2022.
"There are some limited circumstances in which it could be argued that an extension to the implementation period might be preferable if we were certain it was only for a short time," she said.
"A short extension to the implementation period would mean only one set of changes for businesses at the point we move to the future relationship.
"But in any such scenario we would have to be out of this implementation period well before the end of this parliament."
Mrs May added: "The Brexit talks are not about my interests, they are about the national interest.
"And the interest of the whole of the United Kingdom. Serving our national interest will demand that we hold our nerve through these last stages of the negotiations - the hardest part of all.
"It will mean not giving in to those who want to stop Brexit with a politicians' vote.
"Politicians telling the people they got it wrong the first time and should try again."
In her highly-anticipated statement on Brexit, the Prime Minister said that 95% of  the Brexit withdrawal agreement had been completed and "broad agreement on structure and scope" of future relations with EU was reached.
However Jeremy Corbyn said the government was hamstrung by its own divisions, and that the Prime Minister was "losing control."
Mrs May also condemned the killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi and demanded answers about his death.
The Prime Minister's comments came before a statement on the case by Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt.
Mrs May told MPs: "I am sure the whole House will join me in condemning the killing of Jamal Khashoggi in the strongest possible terms.
"We must get to the truth of what happened."
The Prime Minister's remarks in the Commons followed former foreign secretary Boris Johnson urging a robust response to Saudi Arabia over Mr Khashoggi's death.
Britain should "refuse to turn a blind eye" to the murder of the dissident journalist and pressure Saudi Arabia into ending the brutal civil war in Yemen, Mr Johnson said in his Daily Telegraph column.
The former foreign secretary drew parallels between the Istanbul killing and the Novichok attack in Salisbury in March, calling them "state-sponsored plots" designed to "send a terrifying public warning" to opponents.
The Gulf kingdom admitted on Friday that Washington Post columnist Mr Khashoggi, a vocal critic of Riyadh, was killed at its Istanbul consulate but claimed he died after a fight broke out.

Saturday, 20 October 2018

Two charged with murder after father found dead outside his home in south London


Crime reporter,London(wp/es):
Police have charged two men with murder after father died following a mass brawl near his south-west London flat.
Ian Tomlin, 46, was found slumped by the lifts outside his flat in south-west London on Wednesday night. 
Michael Swan, 45, and Gary Beech, 48, will appear in court in connection with his death.
Officers at the Met said Mr Tomlin died of a head injury caused by blunt force trauma following an incident in a communal area of a block of flats in Battersea, south-west London, on Wednesday.
Police were called to a group fighting at the building on Charlotte Despard Avenue at about 5.30pm.
Medics battled to save Mr Tomlin's life, but he was pronounced dead 45 minutes later.
Swan, of Enterprise Way, Wandsworth, and Beech, of Charlotte Despard Avenue, Battersea, will appear at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on Saturday.

The famous faces who joined thousands of protesters at huge march

Staff reporter(wp/es):
Thousands of people from across the country have marched in the capital to demand a final say on the Brexit deal – including famous faces.
Organisers claim more than half a million joined in the central London protest, calling for a fresh referendum.
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan led Saturday’s march, which kicked off at about 1pm and was included by celebs such as Delia Smith and Lord of the Rings actor Andy Serkis.
Mr Serkis said he believed there should be a second referendum, “now people are more informed”, compared to 2016 when the vote was cast.
He added: “The will of the people doesn’t have to stand still, it’s not an immovable thing that is fixed.”
Humans and Crazy Rich Asians actress Gemma Chan also attended, holding a banner with actor Dominic Cooper, which read: “Even Baldrick had a f***ing plan.”
Comedian Jenny Éclair wrote on Twitter that it was a “lovely day for marching”, adding there were so many people there was no room to actually march.
Deborah Meaden, the entrepreneur and Dragon’s Den star also attended, posting an image with herself and Labour MP Chuku Umunna.
She said: “If there's one thing business doesn't like its uncertainty."
Ms Meaden explained what she would do if someone came to me and said, 'I will make your family poorer,' as well as damage businesses and cut off ties to a trading partner.
She said she would respond: "I'm out."
Chefs Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Delia Smith also marched.
Leading speeches in Parliament Square, Delia Smith said people were not fully informed when they voted but now understood "the dire consequences".
"When the vote first happened we weren't fully informed," she said.
"Now we know the dire consequences that can be summed in two words: unmitigated chaos."
She ended by asking MPs where they are and said: "where are you let's be having you," in homage to another famous speech she made.
Stars from the Thick of It were also out in force for the march.
And for the stars unable to attend, tweets of solidarity were posted out.
Actor Hugh Grant said: “Very sorry not to be in the UK for #PeoplesVoteMArch. Will march by myself along around a French village chanting.”
The so-called People's Vote is the idea of another vote on the final Brexit deal, which would likely take the form of another referendum.

Friday, 19 October 2018

UK should bring forward new petrol and diesel car ban to 2032 – MPs

Staff reporter(wp/reuters):
Britain should bring forward a ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans by eight years to 2032 to help the country reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, a parliamentary committee said on Friday.
Britain hopes to become a world leader in electric vehicle technology and currently plans to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2040 as a part of efforts to meet its climate targets.

“If we are serious about being EV (electric vehicle) world leaders, the government must come forward with a target of new sales of cars and vans to be zero emission by 2032,” said Rachel Reeves, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, which authored the report.
The report said the country should improve incentives for the uptake of electric vehicles and criticised a recent decision to cut grants for new plug-in hybrid electric vehicles from November.
It also said the country’s infrastructure, to allow for the charging of electric vehicles, was not fit for purpose.
“The government needs to get a grip and lead on coordinating the financial support and technical know-how necessary for local authorities to promote this infrastructure and help ensure that electric cars are an attractive option for consumers,” Reeves said.
Britain has around 16,500 charging points but will need this to increase to at least 100,000 by 2020, a report from UK-based data company Emu Analytics said in May.
Britain’s energy industry association, Energy UK, backed the call for an earlier start to the ban.
“We firmly support the committee’s call for greater ambition and believe that an accelerated timetable for the roll out of Electric Vehicles (EVs) is both desirable and feasible,” it said.
However, Britain’s Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said the 2040 ban was already ambitious and said meeting the target earlier would be almost impossible.
“Zero emission vehicles make up just 0.6 percent of the market, meaning consumer appetite would have to grow by some 17,000 percent in just over a decade. This is unrealistic,” SMMT Chief Executive Mike Hawes said in a statement.